Gtx 950m Vs Gtx 970 Benchmarks

970 vs 950M

Toll now 250$

Games supported 96%

Toll now 797$

Games supported 69%

General info

Comparison of graphics card compages, marketplace segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in functioning rating	139	428
Value for money	35.09	1.eighteen
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
GPU lawmaking name	GM204	N16P-GT
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release engagement	xix September 2014 (7 years ago)	12 March 2015 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$329	no data
Price at present	$250 (0.8x MSRP)	$797

Value for money

To get the index nosotros compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

Technical specs

General operation parameters such equally number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing procedure, texturing and adding speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment yous take to consider their criterion and gaming exam results. Annotation that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1664	no information
CUDA cores	1664	640
Cadre clock speed	1050 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1178 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	v,200 one thousand thousand	1,870 million
Manufacturing procedure technology	28 nm	28 nm
Thermal pattern power (TDP)	148 Watt	75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	98 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	109 billion/sec	44.96
Floating-point performance	3,920 gflops	i,439 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Data on GeForce GTX 970 and GeForce GTX 950M compatibility with other calculator components. Useful when choosing a time to come computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it'due south interface and passenger vehicle (motherboard compatibility), boosted ability connectors (ability supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it'south notebook size, connectedness slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of existence soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no information	medium sized
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	10.five" (26.vii cm)	no information
Height	4.376" (xi.one cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Recommended system power (PSU)	500 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pins	no data
SLI options	+	+

Retentivity

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no defended VRAM and employ a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM corporeality	four GB	no data
Retentivity motorbus width	256 Chip	128 Scrap
Memory clock speed	7.0 GB/southward	k or 2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224 GB/s	32 or 80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. Equally a dominion, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (and then-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA fries). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Brandish Connectors	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.ii	no information
Multi monitor support	four displays	no data
VGA аnalog display support	no information	+
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	no information	+
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	+	no information
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	+
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	+
GPU Boost	2.0	two.0
GameWorks	+	+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+
BatteryBoost	no data	+
Ansel	no data	+

API back up

APIs supported, including detail versions of those APIs.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	no data
Shader Model	6.iv	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
OpenCL	1.ii	no data
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.one.126
CUDA	+	+

Criterion performance

Non-gaming criterion performance comparison. Note that overall criterion operation is measured in points in 0-100 range.

---

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark operation rating. Nosotros are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if y'all notice some perceived inconsistencies, experience free to speak upwardly in comments section, we normally fix bug quickly.

• 3DMark Deject Gate GPU
• 3DMark Fire Strike Score
• 3DMark Burn down Strike Graphics
• 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
• 3DMark Vantage Performance
• 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
• Passmark
• Octane Render OctaneBench
• GeekBench 5 CUDA
• GeekBench five OpenCL
• GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level x benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just similar Ice Tempest criterion, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced past 3DMark Dark Raid.

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features 2 carve up tests displaying a fight betwixt a humanoid and a fiery beast seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Burn down Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX xi benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, 1 being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite existence washed in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 criterion using 1280x1024 screen resolution. Information technology taxes the graphics carte with two scenes, i depicting a daughter escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a caught planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is at present recommended to be used instead.

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Tempest was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX eleven feature level 9 to brandish a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded past 3DMark Night Raid.

This is probably the almost ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics menu a thorough evaluation under diverse load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, xi and 12 (the concluding being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine past OTOY Inc., available either equally a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Picture palace 4D and many other apps. Information technology renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional person 3D graphics artists.

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 970 and GeForce GTX 950M. Usually measured in megahashes per 2d.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	478 Mh/southward	140 Mh/s
Decred / DCR (Decred)	1.51 Gh/s	no data
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)	22.21 Mh/southward	2.v Mh/s
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)	0.48 kh/s	no data
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)	291.61 Sol/s	no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Hither are the average frames per 2nd in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

1080p	83	30
1440p	54	21
4K	38	16

1920x1080
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	xxx−35 +43.5%	23 −43.5%
Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla	30−35 +267%	nine−10 −267%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +6.5%	31 −six.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +267%	9−ten −267%
Cyberpunk 2077	thirty−35 +267%	9−10 −267%
Far Cry v	30−35 +43.v%	23 −43.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	thirty−35 +50%	22 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +267%	9−10 −267%
Hitman three	30−35 +267%	nine−x −267%
Horizon Zero Dawn	xxx−35 +267%	9−10 −267%
Red Dead Redemption ii	30−35 +267%	nine−10 −267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +73.7%	19 −73.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +267%	9−10 −267%

1920x1080
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	thirty−35 +73.vii%	xix −73.seven%
Assassinator's Creed Valhalla	thirty−35 +267%	9−10 −267%
Battlefield v	30−35 +26.9%	26 −26.9%
Call of Duty: Mod Warfare	30−35 +267%	ix−10 −267%
Cyberpunk 2077	thirty−35 +267%	ix−ten −267%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +57.ane%	21 −57.i%
Far Cry New Dawn	thirty−35 +65%	twenty −65%
Forza Horizon four	xxx−35 +267%	nine−10 −267%
Hitman 3	30−35 +267%	9−10 −267%
Horizon Nil Dawn	30−35 +267%	9−10 −267%
Metro Exodus	39 +680%	5 −680%
Reddish Dead Redemption ii	30−35 +267%	ix−ten −267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +120%	15 −120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	81 +326%	19 −326%
Scout Dogs: Legion	30−35 +267%	9−10 −267%

1920x1080
Ultra Preset

Assassinator's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +200%	eleven −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	thirty−35 +267%	9−ten −267%
Battlefield v	48 +140%	xx −140%
Cyberpunk 2077	thirty−35 +267%	ix−10 −267%
Far Cry v	thirty−35 +73.vii%	19 −73.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	thirty−35 +73.7%	xix −73.7%
Forza Horizon 4	xxx−35 +267%	nine−ten −267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	43 +291%	11 −291%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +267%	9−10 −267%

2560x1440
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +267%	9−x −267%
Hitman 3	30−35 +267%	9−10 −267%
Horizon Naught Dawn	thirty−35 +267%	nine−10 −267%
Metro Exodus	24 +167%	9−ten −167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +267%	9−10 −267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +267%	9−10 −267%

2560x1440
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	thirty−35 +267%	9−10 −267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +267%	ix−10 −267%
Battlefield 5	xxx−35 +267%	9−x −267%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +267%	9−10 −267%
Far Weep 5	xxx−35 +175%	12 −175%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +267%	ix−10 −267%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +267%	9−10 −267%
Sentry Dogs: Legion	30−35 +267%	ix−10 −267%

3840x2160
Loftier Preset

Phone call of Duty: Mod Warfare	30−35 +267%	9−x −267%
Hitman 3	30−35 +267%	nine−10 −267%
Horizon Nix Dawn	xxx−35 +267%	9−10 −267%
Metro Exodus	thirteen +44.4%	9−ten −44.four%
Red Dead Redemption ii	thirty−35 +267%	9−10 −267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	thirty−35 +267%	9−10 −267%
The Witcher iii: Wild Chase	29 +222%	9−10 −222%

3840x2160
Ultra Preset

Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey	xxx−35 +267%	9−10 −267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +267%	9−ten −267%
Battlefield five	20 +122%	9−10 −122%
Cyberpunk 2077	xxx−35 +267%	nine−10 −267%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +450%	6 −450%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +267%	9−x −267%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +267%	9−10 −267%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +267%	9−10 −267%

Advantages and disadvantages

---

Performance rating	33.02	eight.87
Novelty	19 September 2014	12 March 2015
Retention motorcoach width	256	128
Memory bandwidth	224	32
Thermal design power (TDP)	148 Watt	75 Watt

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

since it shows better performance.

Exist aware that GeForce GTX 970 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 950M is a notebook 1.

---

Should you however have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, inquire them in Comments section, and nosotros shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote past clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---

Competitors of GeForce GTX 970 by AMD

Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 970 from AMD is Radeon RX 590, which is about equal in speed and is lower by 1 position in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 970:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 100

Competitors of GeForce GTX 950M by AMD

The nearest GeForce GTX 950M's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX Vega eight (Ryzen 2000/3000), which is faster by 1% and higher past 3 positions in our rating.

Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 950M:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M 100

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with functioning more or less close to those reviewed, providing you lot with more than probable options to consider.

User rating

Hither you lot can encounter the user rating of the graphics cards, likewise as rate them yourself.

---

1621 ratings

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

313 ratings

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

Questions and comments

Here y'all tin enquire a question nigh this comparing, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an mistake or mismatch.

---

Graphics settings

Screen resolution

FPS

California Consumer Privacy Deed ("CCPA")

Under CCPA, Californian residents have the right to declare their preferences on the sale of information for advert and marketing purposes. If you lot wish to change your preferences, click this link to launch our preference portal:

Californian residents also have the right to access and/or delete nerveless data about them. If y'all wish to invoke either correct, please run into this link.

Nosotros utilise a third-political party to provide monetisation technologies for our site. You tin review their privacy and cookie policy here.

Changes

We may update this privacy policy from fourth dimension to time in order to reverberate, for instance, changes to our practices or for other operational, legal or regulatory reasons.

Contact united states

For more data nearly our privacy practices, if you accept questions, or if y'all would like to make a complaint, delight contact united states of america past e-mail at .

heeterphou1968.blogspot.com

Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-970-vs-GeForce-GTX-950M

Share this post